A Hundred Years Of Hollywood History: Part 1

A brief history of Hollywood

By Dror Soref, Nova Filmhouse Founder/CEO

Part one: Edison Invented the Kinescope and Look What Happened!

The Beginnings – Silent Era

about-kietiscopeHollywood’s origin can be traced back to 1890 when Edison invented the first motion picture camera, a peephole viewing machine that he called “kinetoscope.” Originally, silent short films were placed into Vaudevilles (theatrical shows made up of live entertainment such as musicians, plays, and magicians), as fillers between the acts. The owners of Vaudeville did not expect films to be successful, but to their surprise the audiences demanded more movies! That was a major encouragement for the nascent industry. Soon, small studios popped up all over the world, as did “Nickel” motion picture houses. Attendance exceeded 2 million people a week in the US.

Why Hollywood?

Because Edison owned the patents to all the cameras, filmmakers were expected to pay dues. Many independent filmmakers wished to get around Edison’s excessive litigation, so they relocated from New York to Los Angeles. The industry loved the sunny weather and many decided to make Hollywood their home. Hollywood is the name of a district in the city of Los Angeles where the first movie studios were located, and it came to represent the motion picture industry in the US as a whole.


Screen Shot 2013-09-29 at 11.44.28 PMThe introduction of sound in the moving picture (dubbed at the time as “talkies”) was first introduced in feature length film in 1927 with Warner Bros’ The Jazz Singer. After The Jazz Singer’s success, sound on film quickly became the new industry standard in the 1930’s.

The Golden Age

The end of the Silent Era signaled “The Golden Age of Cinema”. Lasting from the late 1920s to the early 1960s the Golden Age is often considered one of the best times for cinema, from influence, artistic and economic standpoints. Historians affirm that the Hollywood industry flourished due the “Studio System” which had begun by 1930.

The “Studio System” (1930-1960’s) relates to an oligopoly with a few studios in Hollywood. Within the studio system, large motion picture companies would produce their own movies, typically on their own studio lots and with creative personnel under long-term contracts (including producers, directors, and actors), and would dominate exhibition (theaters) through vertical integration (they controlled the exhibition and thus could “guarantee” sales). Screen Shot 2013-09-29 at 11.42.44 PMFive corporations dominated production, distribution and exhibition: Paramount Pictures, MGM, 20th Century Fox, Warner Bros, and RKO did all three functions (“The Big Five”), while Universal and Columbia concentrated on production and distribution, and United Artists distributed for independent producers (“The Little Three”). All of these studios still operate today, or bought by another studio—about one hundred years later. RKO was the only one of the major studios to be shut down, due to years of mismanagement (however the company’s movies and literary rights were resurrected in the 1980s). The fact that all of these studios are present in today’s market shows the unparalleled resilience of the Hollywood industry and its studios.

Among the significant characteristics of the Golden Age had been the stability of the Hollywood majors, their hierarchy, and their near-complete domination of the box office. At the midpoint of the Golden Age, 1939, The Big Five had market shares ranging from 22% (MGM) to 9% (RKO); each of The Little Three had around a 7% share. The Little Three are the equivalent of today’s mini majors, such as New Line Cinema (until it became a division of WB). In total, the eight majors controlled 95% of the market and all the smaller companies combined had a total of 5%. Ten years later, the picture was largely the same: The Big Five had market shares ranging from 22% (MGM) to 9% (RKO); The Little Three had shares ranging from 8% (Columbia) to 4% (United Artists). In sum, the eight majors controlled 96% of the market and all the smaller companies combined had a total of 4%. As the “Studio System” started to fade in the 40s, the majors’ grip on the marketplace started to wane.